To which it refers. A or Al que se refiere.
I am wanting to say that I have a question which I have written alongside the item (a sentence) to which it refers.
I can find the following two expressions but am not sure which is correct or whether both are. All the examples I have found are for things that are masculine - eg los problemas, los documentos, los paises, los casos. In this case I have a feminine subject so I am not sure which if any of these are correct.
My guess would have been the first one but if someone could tell me the right way to say it that would be great.
"Tengo una pregunta que está escrita junto a la frase a que se refiere." · "Tengo una pregunta que está escrita junto a la frase al que se refiere."
"Tengo una pregunta que está escrita junto a la frase a la que se refiere."
For that matter I´m not sure about the rest of the sentence either so any suggestions on the normal way to say this would be helpful.
3 Answers
I can't back this up (as yet) with textbook material, but I would simply use "a que." I did find this usage on a Spanish website.
But I found some sources that also use for feminine, "a la que se refiere."
Erikain:
You might find the following helpful. Basically al means a el and should be used only when referring to a masculine noun. You would use a la if referring to a feminine noun. Whether you can use a que without the article (el or la) is the one of the subjects that is addressed below. This comes from lengalia.com, an excellent grammar course written by Spaniards which I have spent a lot of time on.
As I recall, it is never wrong to include the definite article when using a que as a relative pronoun. (Sometimes a que can be used like para que, in which case the definite article should not be used.) The site indicates that with certain prepositions, including a, it is OK to omit the definite article. Sometime the article is needed for clarity when there are multiple nouns in the preceding phrase, since the relative pronoun does not necessarily refer to the closest antecedent. In other words, if there is a masculine antecedent and a feminine one in the prior clause then the inclusion of the definite article can make it clear to which antecedent you are referring. I think it is generally best to avoid such situations by rewording if possible and since it is just one little word, I tend to use the definite article.
From Lengalia:
It introduces specifying (restrictive) and explicative (non-restrictive) sentences.
El corresponsal que escribía reportajes desde Beirut murió anoche.
The correspondent who used to write reports from Beirut died last night.
Ese periodista, que lleva años trabajando como corresponsal, fue amigo mío.
That journalist, who worked for years as a correspondent, was a friend of mine.
When "que" it is not preceded by a preposition, it appears without a definite article.
Los invitados, que estaban en casa, brindaron por los novios.
When we refer to objects and "que" appears after one prepositions, it depends on the preposition:
? with prepositions a, con, de y en, can go with or without the article.
El pueblo en que nací se llama Hacinas.
The town in which I was born is called Hacinas.
El pueblo en el que nací se llama Hacinas.
The town in which I was born is called Hacinas.
? with the rest of prepositions normally is not usual to delete the article.
Los invitados, entre los que había solo amigos, brindaron por los novios.
The guests, between whom there were only friends, drank a toast to the bride and groom.
Tengo una pregunta que está escrita junto a la frase a la que se refiere.
Tengo una pregunta que está escrita junto al adjetivo al que se refiere.
Tengo una pregunta que está escrita junto a las frases a las que se refiere.
Tengo una pregunta que está escrita junto a los adjetivos a los que se refiere.