Home
Q&A
Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction trial

Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction trial

1
vote

Anderson and colleagues evaluated a total of 63 studies with 14,486 participants with median follow-up of 12 months were included. The authors included randomized controlled trials with at least 6 months of follow-up, comparing to the CR-exercise controls Following myocardial infarction or revascularization, or with a diagnosis of angina pectoris or CHD defined by angiography. Studies were pooled using random effects meta-analysis, and stratified analyzes were undertaken to examine potential treatment effect modifiers. Overall, CR led to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality (relative risk: 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.64 to 0.86) and the risk of hospital admissions (relative risk: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.96). There was no significant effect on total mortality, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. The majority of studies (14 of 20) showed higher levels of health-related quality of life in 1 or more domains following exercise-based CR compared with control subjects.

Please, translate this text to Spanish. Thanks.

880 views
updated May 20, 2016
edited by luisssito
posted by luisssito
OK , I remember you now Luis, so you are hoping a member is good enough with medical jargon to translate for you .Good luck mate - ray76, Apr 26, 2016
Hey luissito, give it a try yourself and I'll try to help - RelaxingCup, Apr 26, 2016
Hi Luis. I'm sure I can't do it. lol - rac1, Apr 26, 2016
Que tal luissito? This is rather difficult! - annierats, Apr 27, 2016
The English grammar is not completely correct. Translating to correct Spanish would be quite a challenge. :) - bosquederoble, Apr 28, 2016
Txustaboy could do it. He's a professional tech writer. - Daniela2041, May 20, 2016

2 Answers

1
vote

I did NOT translate this, I found the original article on a Spanish web site. Maybe this will help.

"Anderson y sus colegas evaluaron un total de 63 estudios se incluyeron con 14.486 participantes con una mediana de seguimiento de 12 meses. Los autores incluyeron ensayos controlados aleatorios con al menos 6 meses de seguimiento, en comparación con los controles CR-ejercicio después de un infarto de miocardio o revascularización , o con un diagnóstico de angina de pecho o enfermedad coronaria definida por angiografía . Los estudios se agruparon mediante efectos aleatorios meta-análisis, y se realizaron análisis estratificados para examinar una posible modificación del efecto del tratamiento. En general, CR condujo a una reducción en cardiovascular mortalidad (riesgo relativo: 0,74; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,64 a 0,86) y el riesgo de ingresos hospitalarios (riesgo relativo: 0,82; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0.70 a 0,96). No hubo un efecto significativo sobre la mortalidad total, infarto de miocardio o revascularización. La mayoría de los estudios (14 de 20) mostraron niveles más altos de calidad relacionada con la salud de la vida en 1 o más dominios siguiente ejercicio -basado LC en comparación con los sujetos control [ 6 ]."

updated May 19, 2016
posted by Jack-OBrien
0
votes

IF you want an accurate translation, and I'm sure you do, since it's medical stuff, you may have to pay someone to do it, as opposed to getting it free on this site!

updated May 19, 2016
posted by kmartin69