Home
Q&A
Imperfect vs Subjuncitive

Imperfect vs Subjuncitive

2
votes

I was wondering what form you should use when speaking about something that you ONCE THOUGHT but NOW know is INCORECT: sunjunctive or indicative?

For example: "You thought I could speak French but I actually speak Spanish."

Would that translate to: "Pensabas que pudiera/podia hablar frances pero hablo español" (pudiera or podia)

Gracias compas

1041 views
updated Nov 10, 2015
posted by Elafromexicano

4 Answers

5
votes

Pensabas que podía hablar frances pero en realidad hablo español. Si pudiera hablar frances me habría ido a Francia.

updated Nov 10, 2015
posted by aileribel
Yes, nice answer aribel. - annierats, Nov 9, 2015
Wow it's so cool getting responses on my first question. So it doesn't matter of I did speak it or not. As long as s/he thought I did, it was a reality to them? Otra vez, gracias compa. - Elafromexicano, Nov 9, 2015
And nice follow up example. - Elafromexicano, Nov 10, 2015
4
votes

The thought you had was a true thought for you, even though you were mistaken, so indicative is used just as Aileribel has done. For me, it sounds more natural to not use poder at all in this case: "Pensabas que hablaba frances pero en realidad hablo español."

updated Nov 10, 2015
posted by 005faa61
Thanks for the explination. And you're right I don't think I needed "poder" lol - Elafromexicano, Nov 10, 2015
Great answer, I also tried to avoid 'poder', it is so common in Englsish, but much less so in Spanish. h - annierats, Nov 10, 2015
2
votes

You thought I could speak French but I actually only speak Spanish.

Pensaste que yo supiera francés pero en realidad solo hablo castellano.

Pensaste /pensaba, depends a bit, I'm assuming the person has now realized his mistake as you didn't respond well to his conversational opening in French.

updated Nov 10, 2015
edited by annierats
posted by annierats
Here we are, stuck my head out, waiting for the axe to fall.. - annierats, Nov 9, 2015
I would leave it at "Pensaba" because the act of you thinking about my knowledge of the language is not a specified action with a specified end. The imperfect in this case is similar to the English:"I was thinking" - Natesmith1016, Nov 9, 2015
Pensabas* You were thinking* - Natesmith1016, Nov 9, 2015
The question was between pudiera and podia not pensaba(s). I already have that part down. - Elafromexicano, Nov 10, 2015
Ela fro, as we don't do homework, I didn't like to answer the qwuestions so directly. From supiera you could deduct pudiera, but, go with txtaboy, he is a native! - annierats, Nov 10, 2015
2
votes

I almost agree with the first answer but i would say:

Pensabas que podía hablar frances pero en realidad hablo español. Si pudiera hablar frances me hubiera ido a Francia.

PD: After talking with some job partners my conclusion is that habría is not correct in this sentence. It should be hubiera or hubiese.

updated Nov 10, 2015
posted by txustaboy
Interesting. The grammar taught to English speakers learning Spanish is if plus past subjunctive, then plus conditional, but that with haber the -ra subjunctive can replace the conditional. - bosquederoble, Nov 10, 2015
So based on what I have learned I would have said that habría or hubiera were acceptable, but that hubiese was not. - bosquederoble, Nov 10, 2015
I did agree with Julian on poder- I had wondered if saber (sabía) would have been better. - bosquederoble, Nov 10, 2015
Thanks, as always, txta, does mine work, at all? I tried to avoid giving poder, in case it is home-work. - annierats, Nov 10, 2015
@ Bosque, that's why I tried supiera...One can but try. - annierats, Nov 10, 2015