"Es azul" vs "Es de color azul"
Buenos días,
I would like to know if there is a difference between "El coche es azul" and "El coche es de color azul".
Are these exactly the same or is there a subtle difference?
Any help much appreciated.
All the best, Rangi
3 Answers
I appreciate the answer posted by Feliz above, but in my opinion ,, it is more natural to say " "es de color azul" intead of saying "es azul" or you can say .. "es el coche azul"
This is what I had read somewhere, I don't remember where ,, but perhaps some native friend could clarify the doubt ..
I would prefer saying .. "es de color azul" as against "es azul" .. (as opposed to how we say in English)..
El coche es azul. - The car is blue. El coche es de color azul. - The car is of colour blue. The same thing said in a different ways. The first would seem more natural to say. There is also El coche azul. - The blue car.
Spanish version: Yes, the Spanish would say: El coche es de color azul =The car is blue
They could also say: Tengo un coche azul = I have a blue car
I am not aware of any subtle difference in the meaning but I will ask my native Spanish teacher for you when I next see her. /talk to her.
A Spanish native might ask:
¿De qué color son tus ojos? = What colour are your eyes?
There is no reason why they should follow the Eglish way to ask questions, /express ideas, etc...
English version;
The first sentence is more natural in English The car is blue.
It seems superfluous (unnecessary/redundant) to me in most situations to even mention the word 'colour' in English as it is obvious to most people that blue is a colour!
An exception in English might be if you were wanting to emphasize a contrast or add further information to clarify the point you are trying to make :
eg: The car is a bright blue but has shades of other colours.
I hope this helps ![]()