The Passive with Indirect Object Pronouns
I have a hard time understanding sentences which use se les o se le(the passive and indirect objects/object pronouns) I will use a sentence to explain my dilemma:
El jefe no puede aceptar que los empleados lleguen a la hora que se les de la gana.
does "se les" come from changing "le/les les" to se les? I am used to and I understand se las, se los, se la, se lo e.t.c, I understand those but when it comes to se les or se le, then am stumped. Can anyone explain in detail how this se le/les comes about? and suggestions on materials to read online or otherwise to understand the subject are much appreciated. Thanks
3 Answers
In your sentence the se creates passive voice for the unmentioned agent "giving the gana" and the les is the indirect object of "los empleados".
This use of se should not be confused with the replacement of le when it would be two words of le together (le le changes to se le), ie: Voy a decírselo a ella - not Voy a decírlelo a ella.
Your example is not correct. You must say:
El jefe no puede aceptar que los empleados lleguen a la hora que les de la gana.
The use of "se" in your example is not necessary.
how about a sentence like: You will be given earplugs for the ears. will it be se le darán tapones para los oidos or se le dará tapones para llos oidos or se les darán tapones para los oidos or se les dará tapones para los oidos? how are these kinds of sentences formed?