Le / Lo / La... As You
I'm pretty sure I've read somewhere about some divergence in Spanish usage between le & lo (& la), but there are so many threads about the various uses of these pronouns on Spanishdict that I'm having difficulty in finding what I want.
It's to do with the use of le / lo / la as a direct pronoun form for usted. Today in my Pimsleur course, 'I can take you there' was translated as 'Puedo llevarla allí' (speaking to a woman), whereas I would have said 'le' for 'you' (both genders) but 'lo' for 'him' / 'la' for 'her'.
When I put it into the S D translator it gives me 'le'.
If anyone can explain this or link me to a previous relevant thread, I would appreciate it.
:-0
5 Answers
In Spain the use of "le" as a direct object is not considered incorrect when talking to people. They say "Dios le bendiga" (God bless you to both genders.) Even in most of Latin America the say in the stores for example, "En qué puedo servirle" "How may I help you,
One usage mystifies me though. Why do we say "¡Pégale!" for "Hit it" when referring to a base ball? Sometimes I'm just as mystified by some of the things that are said in Spanish as those said in English.

My understanding was that if it is a direct object (I can take you), you would use "lo" or "la" depending on the gender. If it is an indirect object (I will give [to] you a gift), you would use "le" for both genders.
Now, I have heard of "leismo" which, as I understand it, is the tendency of people to use "le" instead of "lo" or "la" - which would be incorrect, but it's done a lot. ( I have visions of my father saying, "Back in MY day, we would NEVER have spoken like that!!")
By the way, are you on to Level 2 now?
From memory (which is often sieve-like, in my case), I seem to recollect that the Michel Thomas course teaches 'le' as a gender-neutral form of D.O. pronoun, yet MT (like Pimsleur) is (mainly) LA-based. That said, the MT course was devised by Michel Thomas himself, who was European, not a native-Spanish speaker, & I suspect probably exposed to other European Romance languages before he learned Spanish.
Maybe I'll just use 'te' with everyone ![]()
Thanks, everyone.
This makes sense now. 'Leísmo' was the term I'd read before, although I couldn't remember it, and I wasn't sure which way round it works, i.e. LA/European.
Although I recently commented that I find LA pronunciation easier, in respect of this particular grammar nuance, the European use of 'le' as a gender neutral form of direct object pronoun for 'usted' makes more sense to my ear, & I guess I'll probably continue using it even if Pimsleur continues teaching 'lo' & 'la'.
Pimsleur does very much seem LA-based (at least the LA version of the course, which has 5 levels; there is a 'Castellano' (European) version, which has only 2 levels).
Yesterday in one of the lessons they introduced 'manejar' for 'to drive', which I'd heard before, but I was more familiar with 'conducir', which again feels more natural to my ear (maybe because I'm used to the French, 'conduir').
I suppose I may end up with a funny mix of LA/European pronunciation, vocabulary & grammar, but so long as I can make myself understood and understand in return, it'll be a decent enough start ![]()
I use "le" for the D.O. all the time. To me it distinguishes people from objects that get "lo/la".
Also it saves me having to think about gender. One "le" fits all. I wish there were a lot more gender nuetral words in Spanish. Oh well!