"Fue responsable de" or, "era responsable de"?
I should know this. I have studied Spanish for years to the point where pret vs. imperf comes naturally to me. However, any information that I find states that saying someone was responsible for something translates as: él/ ella/ Ud. era responsable de...
Why wouldn't it be "fue responsable de ___"? This just doesn't make sense to me. Maybe the logic is that we are unsure of the timeframe for which the subject was held responsible?
3 Answers
I am not sure why you would say that you cant use fue responsible de to refer to someone who was responsible for something but now that responsibility is over, and you want to make that clear.
Here are linguee examples:
http://www.linguee.es/espanol-ingles/traduccion/fue+responsable+de.html
One example from the link:
Gazexport fue responsable de las ventas de exportación durante la mayor parte del período de investigación.
Gazexport was responsible for the export sales during most of the investigation period.
My guess, and it is only that is as follows:
You become responsible for something at a certain point in time but that responsibility continues over an indefinite time going forward.
He was responsible for the accident. He will always be responsible for the accident. Thus imperfect.
As always with this subject of perfect, imperfect and the not so perfect....context will determine what to use.
He and everybody else know it was his fault. Now consider the following:
He is willing to be punished in whatever way his boss sees fit as long as he is not fired, after all he was the one who committed the mistake. -- fue
A guy is to be blamed for something that happened at the office. Nobody knows for sure who dunnit, but this guy is to be blamed.
He is not willing to accept the blame but he knew he was the one to be blamed. -- era (the fall guy)
![]()
Would that explain to the OP what he's asking?