Possessive Adjective vs. I.D Object Pronoun
I want to translate below sentences in any imaginable situations:
1- (Ella) quiso/quería quemar su coche. :
possible translations:
She wanted to burn his car up.
or: She wanted to burn her(another one) car up.
or: She wanted to burn her own car up.
2- "(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche"
possible translations:
She wanted to burn his car up.
or: She wanted to burn her(another one) car up.
3- "(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche a él" "
possible translation:
She wanted to burn his car up.
4- "(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche a ella" "
possible translation:
She wanted to burn her(another one) car up.
Let me know your idea If my sentences or their translations are false.
6 Answers
The lack of specific pronouns such as he, she, it or his, hers, its. makes Spanish more ambiguous. As your post points out su and sus are very vague.
This is difficult for me and I imagine for other English speakers as well.
For me are OK but the Spanish sentences are "strange":
(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche a él
(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche a ella
I suppose that you add the final part of the sentences "a él" or "a ella" because you want to guide the English Translation (his/her) but in Spanish is common to omit this part except it is a Name:
(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche a él (Strange)
(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche a Paco (Common)
(Ella) Quería quemarle el coche (Common when the members of the conversation know who is the person who his/her car was burned)
EDIT: After some comments and doubts of the English speakers i will try to clarify it.
In theory, it is not incorrect to add "a él" or "a ella", right?. But probably you will never hear a native Spanish speaker add them when he/she is talking (in a similar context). Maybe for a English speaker is difficult to understand why is not necessary to specify the gender of the guy who her/his was robbed (in this case) but we know it "following" the conversation (**). Besides, if there are any doubt about the gender we always use male.
In English language, you are forced to specify the subject with a pronoum or a noum because the verb tells you nothing about the subject. In Spanish the verb tell you "who" is doing the action, and the subject is not required. When the subject does not appear in a sentence it is called "sujeto elíptico".
Each language has its special features and you only can get them with practice. When I speak in English it is difficult for me remember that I can´t say: I don´t give you nothing because in spanish you have to say No te di nada but after a lot mistakes I have learned it
.
I don´t know if this both paragraphs have solved your doubts. If notask me again ![]()
@txustaboy
I used "A él" for determining gender of "le". So my question is how can I determine the gender of "le" in this sentence If i don't want to mention the name of car owner?
@ Joydeep_Singh
Are you sure that "se quiso quemar (or quiso quemarse) el coche" means "she wanted to burn her own car" ??? I guess "quemarse"means " to get burned" not "burn something".
Dear txustaboy,
After reading another topic i reached to a paradox!
You confirmed that the sentence number 4 is true: "she wanted to burn her own car = (Ella) Quería quemarse el coche"
Therefore this sentence should be true too: "(Ella) se quemó el coche = She burned her own car"
And If above sentence is true so this one is true too: " Me quemé el coche = I burned my own car"
So the general rule is: "reflexive pronoun + verb + article + possession"
If this rule is true how do you explain your comment in my past topic:
http://www.spanishdict.com/answers/268569/possessive-adjective-for-parts-of-body/oldest#a830571
your comment: "Me lavo la ventana de la casa. It is not correct for me, "Me" it is not necessary in this sentence."
Why is "Me lavo la ventana de la casa." incorrect whereas it is according to the rule of this topic? Is this a paradox or I have a mistake?
I want to reach to a conclusion. I review some subjects that maybe have ambiguities somewhat in this topic:
1- "a + the name" can be used for clarifying both subjective pronoun and I.D.O pronoun like txustaboy's sentence (that "A Poco" was for clarify "le").
2- "a + the subjective pronoun" is not common for clarifying I.D.O pronoun like sentence number 3 & 4.
3- (Ella) Quería quemarle el coche a Paco = (Ella) Quería quemar el coche de Paco
4- she wanted to burn her own car = (Ella) Quería quemarse el coche
(I think such a construction can be conflict with reflexive or pronominal verb!)
txustaboy will say the last word
. If any of my points are false, please help.
As I explained in your other post, the use of indirect object pronoun is much more extensive in Spanish (than in english,, and the use of the possesive adjectives is far less than english..
So ... le quiso quemar el coche ( de el/ella/ud./uds. etc,)..
If she wanted to burn her own car then you could say..
se quiso quemar (or quiso quemarse) el coche ..