Home
Q&A
agítese antes de usarlo (shake well before use)

agítese antes de usarlo (shake well before use)

2
votes

Hi Friends,

Many of us must have noticed this instruction on the bottles of liquid medicines like cough syrup ... but when we look at the Spanish version of this instruction .. it reads "agítese antes de usarlo" ...which is all well and good but I am not sure why the reflexive pronoun is used along with the verb agitar ... because agitar means to shake and agitarse means to shake oneself ... for example .. cuando se levanta mi perro, se agita el cuerpo (when my dog gets up, he shakes his body) but if we are using the reflexive in our sentence it seems more like .. "shake yourself before using the medicine " hahaha..

Kindly share your views dear friends smile

2352 views
updated May 9, 2014
posted by 00b055e0

3 Answers

2
votes

agítese antes de usarlo

This is written in same form as we write headlines in news articles. The missing word is another lo, so to make the sentence grammatically correct it should be: Agíteselo (Ud.) antes de usarlo. And you´re right - it´s imperative. The se here is to emphasize you but not to indicate passive voice.

The lo in this case cannot mean bottle because of a gender disagreement, so it in effect is a lo of nueter gender.

We can also write this in a less confusing manner by using only infinitive, ie: Agitar antes de usar.

updated May 9, 2014
edited by 005faa61
posted by 005faa61
Great answer friend .. according to me though . it should be "la" used as a direct object pronoun to replace la botella ... agítela - 00b055e0, May 8, 2014
but still ... the use of se is a mystery ... it is clear from the construction that se in this sentence is used as a reflexive pronoun ... but I understand that reflexive pronouns do not follow a set pattern and have multiple aspects - 00b055e0, May 8, 2014
in this case as you stated ,, may be it just intends to emphasize the doer of the action ... but still logically I dont think it is required here .. hehe .. what do u say? - 00b055e0, May 8, 2014
and "lo" of neuter gender is the neuter definite article as per my knowledge, I dont think we have a neuter object pronoun .. Do we? - 00b055e0, May 8, 2014
"La" is not used here because there is nothing prior to define it, so the neuter "lo" is used as an abstract thing - 005faa61, May 8, 2014
ummmm... but we know that we are talking about the bottle .. so if they print this instruction on the bottle .. will they not use la instead ? - 00b055e0, May 9, 2014
How do you know if they are talking about the bottle or the contents or the product, etc? And if they are talking about the bottle, then they cannot write "usarlo". It's abstract - 005faa61, May 9, 2014
I know because .. I am talking about an imprint on the bottle sticker .. hehe .. but I get your point .. thanks - 00b055e0, May 9, 2014
2
votes

Before coming down to a conclusion like that, we should study the use of "se." I read it, and the meaning I get is that I need that shake the bottle. Let's remember that SE is used to create sentences in passive form and of impersonal nature.

updated May 8, 2014
posted by juanmelgar
Yes, I agree, it is the same as saying ' It should be shaken'. - annierats, May 8, 2014
no .. juan .. this is not the passive se or imperso al se ... se is used after the verb when it - 00b055e0, May 8, 2014
when it is used as a reflexive pronoun along with imperative conjugation .. this is an imperative usage of the verb and passive cant be used In imperative mood. - 00b055e0, May 8, 2014
and I am well versed with all the uses of se - 00b055e0, May 8, 2014
0
votes

As many have said there's more to "se" than just reflexive verbs. The way I would directly translate that would be, "shake itself before you using it." The se confirming the subject and that it itself is needed to be shaken. Give me another 10 years living in latin america and I'll give you a real answer.

updated May 9, 2014
posted by Kiwaiano
haha .. 10 years is too long ..9 shud be fine - 00b055e0, May 9, 2014