Active Vs Passive.
My Friends and Respected community members..
I have noticed many times in many books .. that a sentence gets changed from passive voice into active after it is translated from English to Spanish.
The original English sentence is in passive but I have seen numerous instances where the Spanish translation for these is given in active ..
Please see the example below :
English Sentence : You deserve to have your merits recognized. (the noun clause starting with to is a kind of passive) Spanish Translation : Mereces que reconozcan tus meritos (now this is a sentence with two caluses and both the main clause and the subordinate noun clause starting with que where the subjunctive is used ,, are both in active voice).
If I translate the Spanish Translation back to English .. I would mean .. You deserve that they recognize your merits ..
If I were to translate this sentence I would rather have used the "SE Passive" construction and I might have said : se mereces haber reconocido tus merritos (here we don't know the agent so it is difficult to use the TRUE Passive so I used the Se passive).
Another Example :
English Sentence : My car has been stolen.. (Passive Voice In English) Spanish Translation (in the book) : Me han robado El coche ( After translation the Spanish one is given in active voice). which literally means .. They have robbed me of my car.
And there are hundreds of such examples I have in different books.
I fail to fathom as to why the translations for passive are given in active voice ..
If I were to translate this second sentence .. I would have said : Se ha robado mi coche (simply meaning .. my car has been stolen).. Does it have something to do with the style of the natives that they prefer speaking in active and introduce a new subject in the subordinate clause just for the sake of changing it into active voice or is it a mere inadvertence at the end of the book authors ?
I would appreciate any help I could get on this .. Because this really leaves my bedazzled :( ... Thanks and Regards .. Jimmy
4 Answers
Because basically English uses the passive more than Spanish does and direct translation sounds awkward in many cases.
In some cases the Spanish uses structures such as : ''Me han robado'', ''me han pagado' as the norm, the sort of standard setting, when the English standard there is : I've been robbed, I've been paid. ''
To arrive at a god translation you have to avoid word by word, you have to try to use natural sounding language.
@actorgirl.....read the following
I will tell you when it is mostly used among the natives.. heed the following
When the agent is not important to the context .. for example .. los libros son vendidos aquí (por el tendero).... now the agent of the passive sentence mentioned in the brackets has been omitted because it is quite obvious that the shopkeeper (tenbdero) sells the books in his shop .. so here the passive voice is a better choice both in English and in Spanish ..
Where the agent is not known : like .. mi coche fue golpeado ( no sé por quién) My car was hit (I don't know by who) or se golpeó mi coche. ( the se passive ,, but the logic stays the same). Now in this case we don't know who hit my car ,, so I can either use an indefinite subject like some body or some one if I am too fond of active voice and say that some one hit my car ... or I can resort to passive and omit the agent/doer of the action and simply say .. my car was hit.
Where I delibrately want to conceal the identity of the subject (either because he or she is classified confidential or he or she may have done some thing wrong so I dont want to reveal his identity or for any other reason I delibrately want to keep the subject hidden) .. for example the president of some country playing safe in his address to the nation .. he may say .. dos personas se mataron en la manifestación ayer/ two people were killed in the protest yesterday ,, ( he doesnt want to say who did the killing as the order to fire may have been passed by the govt. To disperse the crowd .. so he choses to use the passive and save his image ...
Hope you understand it now,, Regards.
This one is for you my dear friend(actorgirl):
In English : my friend actor girl eats sandwiches. (Active voice) In Spanish : mi amiga actor girl come bocadillas (Active voice)
The above examples are in active voice ,,, because the subject (actor girl) is directly doing the action of eating the sandwiches (which is the object) .. so the action is flowing in the natural order from the subject through the transitive verb COMER to the object ....
Now if we reverse the flow of the action it will become passive ,, where the sandwich will become the passive subject and actorgirl will now be the agent of the passive clause,
See how it changes to the passive now:
The sandwhiches are eaten by actorgirl, my friend.(passive in English) Las bocadillas son comidas por actorgirl (true passive).. Or se comen las bocadillas ( se passive)..
For now leave the se passive as u are allready confused ,, just go one step at a time ..
Hope you understand it now.
I am very confused. I already have enough trouble with my English passive and active, how will I ever get the Spanish down!!??!!!
Are you saying that passive is really not used, or not used at all in Spanish?
Sorry, I am feeling rather dumb here. ![]()