Omitting "Nunca"
Hi, A friend told me these few sentences that got me a little confused. She omitted the use of "nunca" in the first sentence, which i though was kind of essential, cause otherwise, it doesn't make much sense to me.
I told her something, and she wanted to say that she never heard of it.
en mi vida escuché que sea asi
te lo juro
son malvaviscos
aca y en la china
Can you please help me make sense out of it ? Thanks
6 Answers
How did you sort that out ?
Jeje, I made it sound like I figured it out on my own didn't I? But I didn't. Between a friend of mine and WordReference I got the answer. Check out the link below. It's mostly in Spanish, if anyone needs help with translation just let ask.
en mi vida escuché que sea asi
I'd say you need nunca here, otherwise it doesn't make sense to me.
And the rest of the phrases, are you looking for translations?
Cheeses people, why don;t you translate to English?
I haven't herd of that term, not in my lifetime.
Is that correct? Could that "not in my lifetime" be taken as never or ever in this case?
Edit: I made bold my question.
So even my question isn't well formulated.... :-(
FYI, if I don't answer straight, is because i want you to look for the answer, by researching dictionaries and not asking somewhere else and be provided for an answer.....
![]()
To read about how to develop muscles is not going to make you a muscled man. Right?
Okay your link says that "en mi vida = nunca. So what if I say "en mi vida he visto tres veces ....."
Is it never without a qualifier and occasionally with the qualifier?
This one is really strange to me.
I finally got some clarity on this..
en mi vida escuché que sea asi
That's perfectly fine. it's the same as " nunca lo habias escuchado"
I don't quite understand why though.
Chileno
Are you saying...
"en mi vida escuché que sea asi" translates to "I haven't herd of that term, not in my lifetime."
Therefore nunca is not needed?