Does this sentence need a direct object pronoun?
I have a question about a sentence from the 500 Verbs game:
Should there be the direct object pronoun 'lo' added before the verb here?
No reparan a Humpty Dumpty. - They don't fix Humpty Dumpty.
Should it be...?:
No lo reparan a Humpty Dumpty. - They don't fix Humpty Dumpty.
4 Answers
If the direct object precedes the verb, the direct object pronoun must be present also.
No a Humpty Dumpty lo reparan. (required)
With the personal "a" following the verb, the direct object pronoun (lo in this case) is also used before the verb for contrast or emphasis.
No lo reparan a Humpty Dumpty. ( for emphasis)
No reparan a Humpty Dumpy. (no emphasis)
Gohern is right:
If the direct object precedes the verb, the direct object pronoun must be present also.
But it must be: A Humpty Dumpty no lo reparan.
When the D.O. follows the verb the pronoun is not necessary, but we always use it anyway, not so much for emphasis but just from habit. However, this is not incorrect: No lo reparan a Humpty Dumpty.
It depends of what you mean by "They don't fix Humpty Dumpty"
Those people are not in charge of fixing him
They didn't fix him and instead they decided to go drink beer
hmm?
Something else, that I am missing there for some context?
I would say no if the direct object is already there. It sounds redundant to me. But I can't say I'm sure I'm correct and can't point to a rule.