Usar "hay que"
Pensí que la significa, "it is necessary" pero cuando yo uso la transducador, me dice, "There is that" de que es demasiado literal para significar "it is necessary". What does it mean?
6 Answers
¿Traductor? Transducador almost sounds it should be some kind of moneychanger, i.e. "transducater"
"There is that" de que es demasiado literal para significar "it is necessary".
Claro que sale siendo literal porque le metiste al traductor unas dos palabras nada más. Aúnque sea una máquina traductora, te dará mejor resultado cuando escribas una frase entera. Normalmente decimos hay que en vez de "something needs to be done", ej: Hay que pagar la cuenta ....... The bill/check needs to be paid. Esto es una forma de voz pasiva.
Ten en cuenta: I thought ..... Yo pensé
Hay que = it's necessary Don't trust translators
How about "have to"?
Too literal and it doesn't mean the same?
I have a problem with translation and interpretation, to me:
Interpretation = it can be said in different way(s) but the meaning more or less remains the same.
Translation = Taking, if possible, the same words to say it in the other language, taking into account the usual "idiotsyncrasy" of each language.
ie:
casa roja = red house, although poetically speaking, red house could be translated as roja casa.
C?
This was one of the threads on the weekly periphrase thread I have going and has examples and corrections by SilviaC. Here is the one for hay que + infinitivos: