Looking to translate an odd expression
The expression is:
to have ought with someone
It gives the indication of having conflict with another and is used as a noun, more so than a verb. I'm not sure the roots of it; I haven't heard it used much.
6 Answers
Funny, I'm sure I haven't heard that in almost 20 years. Not since my grandfather passed away in my last week of college those many years ago.
I can't comment on the Spanish part of it, but can on the English roots.
It's pretty obscure, but I've heard my grandfather say it. I don't think it's really a noun, but a shortened version of "I ought to have ... with someone", But it came to be a pat phrase, and could be viewed as such.
In general, I think it means one should or could have behaved differently in a conflict
Depending on whether used aggressively or contritely, it could mean, respectively. "I ought to have knocked him in the head" or, "I ought to have been nicer"
I think it comes from conflict, just as you said, and tacitly acknowledges that conflict is often not resolved in the best way, and thus collectively refers to conflict as what ought (should) have been done.
That's my take.
As for Spanish, I have no idea. It's abstract and archaic enough in English, that I doubt there's a very direct translation.
"ought" pronouned "out" in North England can mean "something" the opposite is pronounced "nout" and means nothing.
I give you the viking roots of this:
To have it out with somebody.
This means to fight it out, to sort it, but not by talking, normally.
It is totally outdated in modern Britain .
As rogspax says the "ought" refers to an action not taken when the conflict occurred. I should have (ought to have) been nicer/hit him harder/etc. Thus I think that deber would be the verb in Spanish used to express this afterthought.
I have edited my response after seeing gringojrf's posting:
Estar en deuda con alguien.
Tener una obligación pendiente.
Teamwork does prove effective. Thanks.