Home
Q&A
con lo que cuestan de prender.

con lo que cuestan de prender.

2
votes

Hola,

I'm trying to read a Spanish novel called Riña de Gatos. I find the following sentence hard to understand. Especially the part "con lo que cuestan de prender." My difficulties are:

  • Which meaning of "prender" should I use?

  • Is "costar de" a phrase? Or is there a rule for translating "de + infinitive" construct?

Context: some passengers in a train were talking about why people chose to burn down churches in Spain during 1936-ish period.

Spanish text: Si en toda España el pueblo elige quemar iglesias, con lo que cuestan de prender, por algo será.

My understanding: If all over Spain people choose to burn down churches, with whatever the arrests cost them, it will be for something (i.e. for some purpose).

Gracias,

1707 views
updated Jan 19, 2012
edited by 00494d19
posted by JazSpanish

5 Answers

4
votes

Prender also means to set something on fire.

I read it as:

Si en toda España el pueblo elige quemar iglesias, con lo que cuestan de prender, por algo será.

If in all Spain the people choose to burn churches, with what it takes (costs) them to set them on fire, it will be worth something.

updated Jan 19, 2012
edited by KevinB
posted by KevinB
Right, this is to my mind the most common meaning for prender. For instance, at least in Mexico: Prende un cigarillo, He lights a cigarette. - Jeremias, Jan 17, 2012
Gracias to both, why "de" is used here? This is the first time I see "de" connecting two verbs. - JazSpanish, Jan 17, 2012
1
vote

If in all Spain the people choose to burn churches, with what it takes them (the churches) to actually burn/start burning, it will be worth something.

Almost there Kevinwink

Prender is more to light / to put on fire than to burn...

updated Jan 20, 2012
edited by 00494d19
posted by 00494d19
oh, you said that, set on fire, of course - 00494d19, Jan 18, 2012
Actually, thanks to the fact you misunderstood him a bit, it helped me because I was leaving with the thought that prender = burn even though I know perfectly well the difference between burn and set on fire. - webdunce, Jan 18, 2012
1
vote

If in all Spain the people choose to burn churches, with what it takes them (the churches) to actually catch fire, it must be worth it/it must be worht >their while

Let me know if that sounds natural.

In other words:

Those guys who burn churches must get a real kick out of it, as it really takes a while for a church to actually start burning.

wink

updated Jan 20, 2012
posted by 00494d19
yes, that is it:) - 00494d19, Jan 18, 2012
1
vote

I see, it makes more sense now. However, I still wonder why "de" is used in front of prender. Is there some construct like de + infinitive?

I am going to have a shot at this. Don't forget that one use of the Spanish infinitive is the same as the English gerund: prender = burning.

So, Si en toda España el pueblo elige quemar iglesias, con lo que cuestan de prender, por algo será.

If, throughout Spain the village decides to burn churches, with what they take for burning (what it takes to get them burning), there must be something (some reason they do it.)

updated Jan 20, 2012
edited by Jeremias
posted by Jeremias
0
votes

I see, it makes more sense now. However, I still wonder why "de" is used in front of prender. Is there some construct like de + infinitive?

updated Jan 19, 2012
posted by JazSpanish