"Falta" vs "Sin" ?
I think they both mean to be without but is there a degree of difference or something that would help me to remember when to use them?
6 Answers
Well you could have a degree of something but still lack it (faltar) - maybe you can be kind every now and then but generally you lack that quality. If however you're without (sin) kindness you don't have it in any degree.
Is that what you mean? ![]()
Hi!!!
-The correct translation for "without" is "Sin". "Falta" is a completely different word which is NOT a preposition. You use "Falta" when something is like lost or missing and you can get it later.
-E.g.
-Nos falta gasolina para llegar a Westport / We're out of gas to get to Westport.
-Estoy sin ti / I´m without you
-And by the way, the translation for "Falta" is not "To lack", that's from google translate and it's lame. It´s better saying "out of".
I'm only learning Spanish, so I don't have a lot of first-hand knowledge. I'm just an avid reader of dictionaries (Spanish or otherwise.) Part of the confusion here is that "faltar" is a verb and "falta" is both the third person sing. conjugation of faltar AND a noun. I think some of the answers refer to the verb form and others to the noun. I was posting about the noun.
OK.....so if something should be there but is missing or in short supply (compasion, kindness, dinero, etc) I should use falta.
If something should not be there at all I should use sin.
Kiwi Girl is correct.
Sin is to be without. Falta is to lack.
Quedo sin dinero. I have no money. El vive sin amor. He lives without love.
Falto dinera para comer. I lack (enough) money to eat. Ellos faltan un persona para jugar. They lack one person to play.
So.....if something should be there but isn't (like enough salt in a recip).....that would be "falta"? But if something should not be there at all, it is "sin"?