English Grammar Uncertainty
For a long time now, I have wondered which word order is correct or if both are. (I have also seen past perfect used with both verbs in this kind of sentence, but I believe this is incorrect):
I would have loved to go to the cinema with you
or
I would love to have gone to the cinema with you
11 Answers
Both are correct, but the tenses of the sentences are different.
I would love....to have (just puts what you would love into a perfect tense)
me gustaría.....
I would have loved..... whatever (conditional past perfect tense)
me hubiera/habría gustado
Both are correct.
To show how the first one is correct, if some people were talking about a movie that they saw last night, someone that couldn't make it might say:
I would have loved to go!
They are both correct but mean quite different things.
I would have loved to go to the cinema with you
Refers to the desire (to accompany you) that I had at the time that you went (in the past).
I would love to have gone to the cinema with you
Expresses my current regret that I did not go with you. Perhaps, at that time I had no wish to go but later found out that it was a very good movie.
I would have loved to go to the cinema with you
- this one sounds to me like you're talking to someone about to go to the movies but you can't go and you're stressing the fact that there's a reason why not.
And your second one would work there too, I would love to have gone to the cinema with you
But for me if they have already been and you're talking to thema after the fact then I would say:
I would have loved to have gone to the cinema with you. ![]()
I would have loved to go to the cinema with you
or
I would love to have gone to the cinema with you
The second one: I would love to have gone sounds better to me. Both are used but the first one sounds as if it is missing something
![]()
May I suggest another alternative?
I would have loved to have been able to go to the cinema with you I know this is more wordy but this is also correct and certainly sounds better than the first sentence..
Julian, I find from experience, as a native English speaker, that the phrases that seem to increase in popularity are not necessarily those that are closest to being grammatically correct but those which trip of the tongue most easily and sound more natural. Some of these are grammatically correct and others like the first one sound unnatural to a native like myself; they seem somewhat clumsy, lacking a finesse/finishing touch if you pardon the expression.
I hope this helps ![]()
Thank you for your recent confirmation of one of my responses in Spanish It encouraged me greatly to know there was nothing to correct (hay nada que corregir)
I'm with Tosh, both.
They both seem correct to me.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...Julian isn't a native Spanish speaker?
Since when?!
Neither sounds "formal" to me. I would use them both, depending upon context -- much as Samdie pointed out above:
I would have loved to go to the cinema with you
I was unable to go with you to that particular showing of the movie.
I would love to have gone to the cinema with you
To my regret, and despite opportunities, I have been unable to fulfill my desire to go to the cinema with you.
The first one seems more practical and natural to me. It's what I would say. The second is almost more formal sounding. Anyway, they're both correct as far as I know!
I would have loved to go to the cinema with you
or
I would love to have gone to the cinema with you
The first one doesn't sound correct to me. Of course, a person would causally ignore the error in a conversation.