Is this the redundant "Le" ?
Parece que le quería cobrar una cuenta vieja.
And the IDO being the old account ?
3 Answers
The le there is the i.o.p., but it is not redundant as the old account is the direct object of cobrar.
It seems that he wants to charge the old account to him. (cobrar has several different meanings)
It seems that he wants to collect the old account from him.
Either way the old account is the d.o. of cobrar.
The le i.o.p. is "redundant" if the i.o. is also explicitly stated.
A María le gusta hablar español. (here le is the redundant i.o.p. and a María is the i.o.) [intransitive sentence, no d.o.]
Dale el libro a Juan. (the le is redundant as a Juan is explicitly stated)
The le i.o.p. is "redundant" if the i.o. is also explicitly stated.
Isn't it rather the case that the i.o., if explicitly stated, is the redundant word?
Because after all, the i.o.p. is required no matter what.
Dale el libro a Juan. (the le is redundant as a Juan is explicitly stated)
I know nothing about grammar, but in this case I don't think "le" is redundant.
Da el libro a Juan (Who has to pass the book?)
Dale el libro (Whom do you have to pass it to?)
Am I OK?