Should: Deber, Conditional VS Present
I'll try to make this quick...
I have seen phrases like this:
iPhone 5 debe llegar a las tiendas europeas el día 15 de octubre.
Mandé el paquete y debe llegar el 6 de marzo antes de las 13:30 (antes de la 1:30 de la tarde if in Latin America).
And then I find some that use the conditional, but seem to have the same meaning... "should arrive":
Le debería llegar dentro de tres o cuatro días después de pedirlo...
Now, should the last one say "debe llegar" as well, or do you have a little bit freedom here?
I thought that "debería" expresses more of a possibility... So, could any of the first examples use "debería" instead of "debe"?
6 Answers
Hi! ¨debería llegar¨¨or ¨debe llegar¨are interchangeable, at least for me.
I like your new nickname ![]()
debería = You should (advice)
debe = You must (obligation) ![]()
Frankly, given the worldwide problems with making deliveries on time, I should remain hopeful and use whichever expression takes your fancy.. It will not affect the result (delays, normally). ![]()
I think that this is hard to translate into English because of our uses of 'Should" and "would". When using deber to express a package arriving (as in your above examples), I would think that using presente (debe) indicates more a simplistic necessity. The conditional (debería), however conveys more of an understanding that something could go wrong and the package might not make it within the necessary amount of time. Therefore, when sending a package overseas, I would use the conditional. Please let me know if I am way off.
debe llegar = must arrive.
The phone should arrive soon. - El teléfono debería llegar pronto. - is not conditional in English
I'm going to bump this up...
Thanks for the answers everyone =) but I know the uses for "deber"... I am just wondering about the use in the example I gave.
I have seen both "debe llegar" and "debería llegar" for "should arrive"... are they interchangeable in any of the examples I gave above?