Why "fuego?" in the dictionary video...It doesn't make sense!
On the dictionary page of "incendio," if you play the video, you will see the script is very very very wrong. How come the lady employs a sentence that doesn't have "incendio" in order to show "incendio?" Doesn't make sense!
In the applied sentence, she applied fuego instead of incendio, without explaining why she replaces it. While describing incendio, she abruptly jumps into another word fuego. That's irresponsible, because not all learners know what fuego means.
5 Answers
Then she (or anybody who wrote the script) should have employed another sentence where "incendio" sounds perfectly fit. So, easy, they just have to give an exactly correct example.
I honestly don't think we have much room to complain about this site. It's all ran with hard work and dedication, out of people's free time. And, of course, its free =)
You have a good point.
To report this error, please use the "Feedback" button at the bottom of the page.
Thanks, and welcome to the forum.
Just as in English, we don't say "I put conflagration to a pile of wood" in Spanish we don't say "Puse incendio a las leñas." In English, you can say "I set fire to a pile of wood. It's a conflagration." The tutor is saying "he set fire to the pile of wood. [It's] an incendiary."
It may not be the clearest presentation, but you can't use the word "incendio" the way you are apparently trying.