implicit use of "ser"
Is it valid to leave "ser" out in some cases where it is can be assumed, implicitly?
I saw the following in my Spanish dictionary:
Los verbos irregulares se encuentran en el diccionario por orden alfabético remitidos al infinitivo
It seems to me "son" is implied here before "remitidos"?
2 Answers
The building was enormous, built entirely from ......
Eldrege Cleaver was a political activist, born in ....
We use past participles like that (adjective phrases or clauses) all of the time.
I don't think that it would make sense with ser in there would it? Unless I'm making a mistake in translating 'remetidos' which is quite possible je je ![]()
The irregular verbs are found in the dictionary in alphabetical order under the infinitive.