Home
Q&A
implicit use of "ser"

implicit use of "ser"

1
vote

Is it valid to leave "ser" out in some cases where it is can be assumed, implicitly?

I saw the following in my Spanish dictionary:

Los verbos irregulares se encuentran en el diccionario por orden alfabético remitidos al infinitivo

It seems to me "son" is implied here before "remitidos"?

1255 views
updated Sep 17, 2011
posted by tomsky

2 Answers

1
vote

The building was enormous, built entirely from ......

Eldrege Cleaver was a political activist, born in ....

We use past participles like that (adjective phrases or clauses) all of the time.

updated Sep 17, 2011
posted by 0074b507
Ah thanks, I wasn't thinking about it like that... Had there been a comma as in your examples, it would have read better for me. - tomsky, Sep 17, 2011
1
vote

I don't think that it would make sense with ser in there would it? Unless I'm making a mistake in translating 'remetidos' which is quite possible je je smile

The irregular verbs are found in the dictionary in alphabetical order under the infinitive.

updated Sep 17, 2011
posted by Kiwi-Girl
Yes, I was being a little silly in misreading it. But that sounds good. - tomsky, Sep 17, 2011