Hubieras tocado
"Me hubieras tocado a puerta cuando estabas en la casa."
Is this sentence correct? A native speaker said it but I'm confused.
I don't understand why it's subjunctive (hubieras)
And I don't understand why 'me' is used.
And, my brain is trying to read this as: "you could have knocked on the door when you were at the house." but since there's no 'poder' I think it says: "you had knocked on the door when you were at the house." but that makes no sense to me. Especially since I was there and didn't knock. Maybe it's meant to be a question.
"Had you knocked on the door when you were at the house?" Is that the best way to say it instead of "Did you knock on the door?"
Can anyone explain this before I go nuts?
I hate being confused!
Thanks!
5 Answers
In some regions the imperfect subjunctive replaces the conditional indictive. It can also means should have when talked about past obligation. I don´t understand the use of me, but it could you should have knocked when you were at the house.
"Me hubieras tocado a puerta cuando estabas en la casa."
I still don't know why it's subjunctive. ? Is it like BellaMargari said?
In some regions the imperfect subjunctive replaces the conditional indictive. It can also means should have when talked about past obligation. I don´t understand the use of me, but it could you should have knocked when you were at the house.
This means, You should have knocked on the door when you were at the house.
Does that help?
El subjunctivo me hace dificil aveces tambien. ![]()
I am not surprised, I am confused too, jeje, this sentence makes no sense, why would you knock if you were already inside the house?
Two hotties going nuts!
¡Esto ya es el colmo!