If it was Ignacio, he wouldn't have been able to talk anyway.
If it was Ignacio, he wouldn't have been able to talk anyway since he doesn't speak English.
A lawyer called for Ignacio, long story, so I asked Olga (Spanish only) , long conversation.
End Result, we decided that Ignacio wasn't here even though we didn't know (even we didn't know who he was) because he wouldn't want to talk to a lawyer, but I wanted to say
"If it was Ignacio, he wouldn't have been able to talk anyway.since he doesn't speak English"
So I said "Si fuera Ignacio no podría hablar de todos modos, que más da...... no puede hablar en íngles. A estas alturas no voy a buscarlo y punto" and told him he wasn't here.
But I don't know about "Si fuera Ignacio no podría hablar " though Olga got it, maybe, "si estuviera no importa ya que no puede hablar en íngles" but that's not how I would say it in English at all, so I don't know. I have a strange way of talking I'd really like to retain my speech patterns to some degree and not sound like a Spanish robot.
Gracias.
4 Answers
In any case, jeez, it must be no sabe hablar inglés, o no habla inglés.
My choice.
De haber estado Ignacio, no hubiera podido hablar de todos modos ya que no habla inglés /ya que no sabe inglés.
besos![]()
Si era (or fuera, however you like) Ignacio, no importaría porque de todos modos no sabe ingles. (or no habla ingles)
That would be "if it was Ignacio, it wouldnt matter anyways because he doesnt know english (or doesnt speak english)
or "De todos modos, si fue Ignacio, no habla ingles"
"Regardless, if it was Ignacio, he doest speak english"
"Si estuviera aquí Ignacio, de todos modos no podría haber contestado ya que no habla inglés."
Hmm...when I speak I'd say:
"Hombre, igual no podría hablar si fuera Ignacio, ya que no habla inglés."
This is if it's an assumption.
But if it's in the past:
"Hombre, igual no podría haber hablado si hubiera sido Ignacio, ya que no habla inglés."
--
Si estuviera: if he was there
Si fuera: if it was him
That's how I'd understand them.
And in English is it incorrect to say: "if it had been ignacio he wouldn't have been able to talk." in this situation because it's in the past?