Home
Q&A
Loose, as a verb in english.

Loose, as a verb in english.

6
votes

Among the myriad of uses for "loose" is its use as a verb.

In searching through the "usual suspects" in the verb form its uses are very limited and (in american english ) seem a bit archaic.

Examples from Oxford English and Macmillan:

They loosed a barrage of arrows against the oncoming infantry.

The recent uprisings have loosed a revolution in the region.

He loosed the dogs against the intruders.

Yes we have all seen this in literature,poetry and in some U.N speeches. but I cannot say that I have heard this in common ( but correct) speech.As language differs around our world, so then,

The questions are:

Do you use this form? do you hear it used ? How do you use it? Where are you in the world?

***Thank you all for your input

7879 views
updated Jun 6, 2014
edited by pacofinkler
posted by pacofinkler
You're not intending to say "loosen" right? (just checking) - DJ_Huero, May 24, 2011
Right DJ this is the subject of our morning debate, using it as a verb - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
"to loose" is a normal verb - as is "to loosen" - ian-hill, May 24, 2011
"loosed" and "loosened" are the past tenses. - ian-hill, May 24, 2011
Interesting... =) - DJ_Huero, May 24, 2011
Now I have "goodbye toulouse" in my head. - rabbitwho, May 24, 2011

18 Answers

3
votes

Most of the time I see "loose" as a verb, it's just a misspelling of "lose" smile

updated May 25, 2011
posted by pesta
Thanks Pesta! - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
Yes. - Seb79, May 24, 2011
3
votes

I would agree with your summary of the word "loose" in verb form. However, I would say that using the word "let" in front of "loose" is more commonplace.

He let loose his arrow.

He let loose the dogs.

I am from multiple places along the East coast of the USA.

updated May 25, 2011
edited by danrivera
posted by danrivera
Thanks Dan - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
3
votes

I never use loose in that way; I would always use unleash instead.

Apparently loosed can also be used in a different sense where I would always say loosened.

updated May 25, 2011
posted by lorenzo9
Thanks Lorenzo! - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
Everytime I hear or read "unleash", I can't help thinking about films like "Ben Hur," "Gladiator," "Troy" et al. - 002067fe, May 24, 2011
Not Jerry Seinfeld at he gas station with his perfect pour and his AMEX card? - lorenzo9, May 24, 2011
Jejej! - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
2
votes

It is used where I am from (USA), however I don't commonly use it like in your examples.

If I was going to use it with the dog example, I'd say "He let the dogs loose on the invaders", "he loosed the dogs" sounds weird and incorrect to me.

updated Jun 7, 2014
posted by cheeseisyummy
It is more archaic, as described. - danrivera, May 24, 2011
Thats how i see it - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
2
votes

I have heard it used as, " They set him loose" or maybe , let the horses loose. I don't think I hear it very much though,

updated May 25, 2011
posted by sanlee
Thats what i am looking for , regular ordinary daily usage - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
1
vote

Do you use this form? Me personally? No but I understand it perfectly

do you hear it used ? Only on the news etc

How do you use it? N/A

Where are you in the world? England

"They loosed a barrage of arrows against the oncoming infantry."

Yes, it's more of a "set expression" as I see it

updated May 25, 2011
posted by patch
Same answers, but I'm in Ireland. - rabbitwho, May 25, 2011
1
vote

They set him loose" or maybe , let the

horses loose.

Hey, but this is not a verb!!

Loose is an adjective. to lose a verb. and loosed...omg, I would KILL my students if they made that mistakemad

This is what I first thought, until I found this of course:

v. loosed, loos·ing, loos·es

v.tr.

  1. To let loose; release: loosed the dogs.

  2. To make loose; undo: loosed his belt.2.

Wow, interesting, I had no idea one could use loose as a verb.grin

updated May 25, 2011
posted by 00494d19
Believe me, you were better off not knowing and killing your students. - lorenzo9, May 24, 2011
mind you I have no intention to let them know, jeje - 00494d19, May 24, 2011
Mil gracias Heidi - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
1
vote

I think loosed is one of those words like behemoth.

updated May 24, 2011
posted by Yeser007
Har! pienso que sí - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
Behemoth is a perfectly legitimate noun and it's used all the time. - babs_irish, May 24, 2011
Is that a kind of elephant ? :) - ian-hill, May 24, 2011
1
vote

I agree 'loosed' as a past tense is archaic. I have seen it in literature but it is not a term i would use.

As others have said it would be expressed as 'let loose' . In Lectors example above I would say 'He let loose a stream of invective'

updated May 24, 2011
edited by MaryMcc
posted by MaryMcc
Invective is a collective noun (like mankind), it cannot (properly) be used in the plural. - Lector_Constante, May 24, 2011
Actually, it can be properly be used in the plural even though it wasn't in this case. - lorenzo9, May 24, 2011
OK I stand corrected, duly edited - MaryMcc, May 24, 2011
1
vote

You can try a dictionary - loose is a legitimate verb, but refers to words; "he loosed a stream of invective". It has been used to mean "set free" but when does any of use ever actually set anything free? You can loose your dog, but only if you mean to imply that you are setting completely at liberty to run away, attack or run down something. Usually when you loose your dog, you are not actually loosing it because you will be (or should still be) in some control of the pooch. And originally, loose was just an adjective, but you know how we speakers of English are - If it isn't loose, let's loose it or at least loosen it! We can't resist using old words in new ways! When you "let loose" (i.e., free, release from bonds) you are "allowing" the direct object to go "loose" which is an adjective (loose dog). Loosen is also a verb, and I bet everyone of us has loosened our shoes, belts, grip, etc. at one time or another.
alt text

updated May 24, 2011
posted by Lector_Constante
Thanks Lector , I have been there ,my interest is Your experience with this form - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
1
vote

I (and my family) like to speak this kind of English: "thrice" and "loosed" etc. My friends think it's pompous. cheese

updated May 24, 2011
posted by jaimetayag
And it is fun also - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
1
vote

"to loose" is a normal verb - as is "to loosen"

updated May 24, 2011
edited by ian-hill
posted by ian-hill
but do Y O U use it, and if so how.and where are you? - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
If I were writing a book or something I might. Of course "to loosen" is a more common verb. - ian-hill, May 24, 2011
exactly Ian. by the way, I was too late to ban you for banning me jejeje! I actually thought of this as a suggestion for your confusing english words - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
1
vote

I have never heard or read 'loosed' being used in any of the ways you mentioned. In fact, 'loosed' just sounds completely wrong. I am from England.

I would say: "They fired a barrage of arrows against the oncoming infantry"

"The recent uprisings have led to a revolution in the region"

"He let loose the dogs against the intruders".

However, I must add I couldnt be 100% sure that the above are grammatically correct, I am just writing as I would speak!

updated May 24, 2011
posted by billygoat
Thanks Billygoat! - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
It isn't wrong, just archaic. - MaryMcc, May 24, 2011
I said it 'sounds' wrong! ;) - billygoat, May 24, 2011
1
vote

I can't say that I have heard this form, but then, my experience of the world is very limited. tongue wink

I think in the third instance you've pointed out: 'He loosed the dogs against the intruders', I'd use the word, 'set'.

Although I wouldn't use 'set' in all the sentences in which you've used 'loosed'.

I think it's a very odd word...

updated May 24, 2011
posted by Seb79
'Set forth' is an unusual way of putting it, but I reckon that it could be equally be used. - Seb79, May 24, 2011
Ermmmm...I guess it'd sound weird as well. - Seb79, May 24, 2011
I definitely wouldn't say 'set forth'. Too old fashioned. - Seb79, May 24, 2011
you would if you were telling a story,and wanted a special emphasis. - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
Yes, but in normal conversation... - Seb79, May 24, 2011
That is precisely the question, I cannot say i have heard that form in ordinary speech - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
Hmmm. True. - Seb79, May 24, 2011
1
vote

I used it just yesterday! I was telling a story about a scene I'd observed in a store and I said, "And then she loosed a stream of obscenities on the salesclerk." But I wouldn't say it's a very common usage these days.

updated May 24, 2011
posted by babs_irish
You must be part of the 1%. ;) - Tosh, May 24, 2011
Yes, used in a literary,prosaic,or to create an emphasis - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011
Is that an elite group, Tosh, or just a bunch of weirdos? :-) - babs_irish, May 24, 2011
you will find it in literature, poetry and in speeches. - pacofinkler, May 24, 2011