Why does the imperative statment "Do Not Pass" translate "No Pasar" in Spanish?
I thought it would be translated in the imperative form and not simply using the infinitive. Someone help! ![]()
5 Answers
It is perfectly acceptable to use the infinitive in giving general commands
Really? It is fine in notices and boards, but you don't talk to people like that... unless you are a foreigner who can't conjugate verbs. The reason is that it is a short for:
No entrar = No [está permitido] entrar
It is not imperative, but a prohibition written in impersonal style, and omitting the crucial "está permitido" (or any other implicit phrase)
After all, we do the same in English
The comparison is not valid. "Don't touch" is the imperative in English, and it is normally used when talking, while in Spanish is grammatically unacceptable.
We have a similar form in English, where we use the gerund form with no subject: No touching, no running, no smoking, etc. This is equivalent to the Spanish: No tocar, no correr, no fumar.
Often, however, because that doesn't feel as elegant so we use a more forceful or pointed directive in English: Don't touch, don't run, don't smoke. You can do the same in Spanish, but it's not common the way it is in English.

No pasar is correct. Like No tocar=Don't touch No moverse=Don't move...
It is perfectly acceptable to use the infinitive in giving general commands on notice boards which give warnings but I do not mean that that to apply to general conversation
I hope this helps ![]()