Clarification of an article in the Reference Section: Direct / Indirect Object Pronouns
After reading a question and the answers regarding object pronouns earlier this morning, I thought I should do a little more reading about these and prepositions. So I looked in Reference Library and started reading the 'Prepositions' article under the Grammar Section.
One of the examples for usage of the prepostion 'a' says.......
"to introduce an indirect object (to, for)
Le di el regalo a Celia. (I gave the gift to Celia.)
Compré los tomates a Anita. (I bought the tomatoes for Anita.)"
My question is, shouldn't the 2nd example include the i.d.o pronoun for Anita? ie
Le compré los tomates a Anita
Am I confusing myself again! Your comments would be appreciated.
4 Answers
"Compré los tomates a Anita" sounds strange, incomplete. I'd definitely add "le".
I have pm'd Heidita on this, so I will leave it up to her to decide if the reference article should be amended.
Thanks for your input on this guys.
I would agree with Lazarus .
it does look strange and incomplete in its present state
In addition, I have been watching Paralee's video lesson on Direct and Indirect object in the last two days yesterday and she mentions that
''If there is an indirect object there must be an indirect object pronoun'':
The direct object pronoun is tomatoes and the indirect object pronoun is Anita
so yes, you should include an indirect object pronoun ![]()
I hope this also helps ![]()
[official rules for atonic pronouns](http://buscon.rae.es/dpdI/SrvltConsulta?lema=pronombres personales atonos)