Home
Q&A
which language came first

which language came first

1
vote

where does english fit in with the timing of the first language of man??

10501 views
updated Mar 1, 2011
posted by charlie66
And this figures in with learning Spanish how? Or for English learners, same question.... - cristalino, Mar 1, 2011
And why not? we answer all manner of these things, just because we can.By the way is that agave on its way to the distillary? - pacofinkler, Mar 1, 2011
Órale Paco, ¿qué hay de nuevo? You know I just get cynical at times! :) - cristalino, Mar 1, 2011

6 Answers

5
votes

Middle English (the language of Chaucer [c. 14th century]) can be understood (but with great difficulty) by modern English speakers. The English of Shakespeare (two centuries latter) is much more accessible (but still causes problems for many modern speakers). Old English (Anglo-Saxon) (the language of Beowulf) sounds completely foreign to English speakers (one might as well be listening to Norwegian/Swedish/German). By way of contrast, El Canto de Mio Cid (contemporary with Beowulf) Like The Canterbury Tales, can be read by modern speakers of Spanish (although, with some difficulty). What this suggests is that over the past 800-900 years, Spanish has (for better or worse) changed more slowly (has been more conservative) than English.

Modern linguistics suggests that all living languages change/evolve over time (perhaps at different rates but, nonetheless, change they do [and the accumulation of changes over several centuries can render the older form of the language unintelligible .to the speaker of the newer form).

Among linguists, the standard for distinguishing between different languages and different dialects, of the same language, is mutual intelligibility. By this measure, Old English and modern English are different languages. (For this reason, I prefer to refer to "Old English" as "Anglo-Saxon").

Turning to "the first language of man", if you mean, based on scientific evidence , the answer is that there is no answer. The evidence suggests that there were spoken languages for many thousands of years before there were written languages and, thus, we have no record of the earliest spoken languages. Judeo-Christian mythology, of course, provides a much simpler account. This myth does not, in fact, identify the "original" language but simply asserts that there was a common language.

updated Mar 1, 2011
posted by samdie
1
vote

English has a germanic base, and in the long time-line of human language is very modern.

updated Mar 1, 2011
posted by pacofinkler
0
votes

Body / sign language came first.

updated Mar 1, 2011
posted by ian-hill
0
votes

Old English (also called Anglo-Saxon) is an early form of the English language which was spoken in England around the year 1000. It is a West Germanic language and therefore is similar to Old Frisian and Old Saxon. It is also quite similar to Old Norse (and by extension, to modern Icelandic). The last point I found somewhat interesting, that is, the parallelism to modern Icelandic...I realize that is referring to Old English, but anyone out there speak any Icelandic? surprised It's almost as if Old English has been preserved on that island after all these years....

updated Mar 1, 2011
posted by cristalino
It is more like "old Danish" in fact. - ian-hill, Mar 1, 2011
0
votes
updated Mar 1, 2011
posted by 0074b507
So, a form of English wasn't spoken at the Tower of Babel? ¡Si sólo supiera que tan mal me siento! (correct?) :) - cristalino, Mar 1, 2011
Ummmm....no. It would have been Greek, Hebrew, Latin, and various other languages. English is derived from Latin, and German... - 001a2987, Mar 1, 2011
Wait a minute now. You guys are confusing me now. Wasn't it firmly established in that other thread a few weeks ago that everyone was sent packing from Babel with ther respective language grammar books under their arms? - Gekkosan, Mar 1, 2011
Ah... in case it wasn't apparent, my comment above is purely tongue in cheek... :o) - cristalino, Mar 1, 2011
lol Gekko - Now that I think about it, I think you might be right... - 001a2987, Mar 1, 2011
0
votes

I'm not an expert and I haven't researched it, but I think it morphed from Saxon (and a bunch of other languages). I have heard Saxon in it's spoken form and it really doesn't sound anything like english. My best guess for the timeline is somewhere between the 5th and 8th centuries. Someone let me know if I'm way off.

updated Mar 1, 2011
posted by Beatrice-Codder