Home
Q&A
Olvidar - does it always need a direct object

Olvidar - does it always need a direct object

2
votes

Simple I know - but I just wanted to say 'Don't forget.' to someone as a complete sentence. So would I need to say 'No lo olvides.' or could I just say 'No olvides' - the second one seems weird.

Is it because olvidar is transitive and always needs a direct object - and is that 'always, always' even when the d.o. is understood based on a previous sentence?

Is that the same for olividarse too?

1418 views
updated Jan 19, 2011
posted by Kiwi-Girl

2 Answers

3
votes

"No olvides" alone sounds very weird without an object. "No te olvides" doesn't sound that bad, though.

updated Mar 31, 2011
edited by lazarus1907
posted by lazarus1907
Thanks Laz I was thinking the same thing - does that mean that olvidarse is intransitive? - Kiwi-Girl, Jan 16, 2011
1
vote

You can always make it a nice positive sentence instead?

Acuérdate de comprar pan.

Unless you're really fond of olvidarse! smile

updated Jan 19, 2011
posted by galsally
Thanks Sally, although it's easy if you have the direct object in your sentence, eg the pan, but I was just after the short ' 'don't forget!' :) - Kiwi-Girl, Jan 16, 2011
Ah I see! :) - galsally, Jan 19, 2011