Why "se"? And should I be using "nunca"?
¡Mis fines de semana no se pierden!
My weekends are never wasted!
Why is wasted translated as ""se pierden"?
I understand perder = to lose, to waste and that weekends are plural so perder is congugated to third person plural in the present tense. But if "se" is correct I don't understand why.
Also should "no" be "nunca"? - Mis fines de semana nunca se pierden
4 Answers
If you wish to say "are never wasted", then the correct translation is: "nunca se pierden", or even better, "nunca se desperdician".
The use of "se" indicates that the subject "my weekends" (mis fines de semana) never get wasted.
The verb is perderse, hence the inclusion of the reflexive pronoun "se".
Y a mi parecer, está bien tu frase así.
Hi bandit , I think if this is the machine translator it tends to lead us to wrong answers.
I'd say it as you said like:
¡Nunca son perdidos mis fines de semana!
And if it's said with se it's the impersonal se as you may have guessed. Just because it's passive, the translator makes it se.
I understand perder = to lose, to waste and that weekends are plural so perder is congugated to third person plural in the present tense. But if "se" is correct I don't understand why.
Because if you say it without "se", the sentence is incomplete and meaningless:
¡Mis fines de semana no pierden..... [¿Qué es lo que no pierden tus fines de semana?]
My weekends don't lose..... [what is the thing your weekends don't lose?]