Home
Q&A
"How does our language shape the way we think?"

"How does our language shape the way we think?"

10
votes

I had to share this fascinating article by Lera Boroditsky an assistant professor of psychology, neuroscience, and symbolic systems at Stanford University. It is a must read for those who want to understand how our language studies affect our cognitive development.

2650 views
updated Jan 29, 2011
edited by 00494d19
posted by renaerules
¡Muy interesante! - 00d7cd75, Jan 9, 2011

10 Answers

5
votes

This is so cool!

"In Turkish you'd have to include in the verb how you acquired this information: if you had witnessed this unlikely event with your own two eyes, you'd use one verb form, but if you had simply read or heard about it, or inferred it from something Bush said, you'd use a different verb form."

And this is absolutely true,and I can say that it's the most challenging thing for a foreign speaker to understand too.

updated Jan 9, 2011
posted by culé
Wow! - webdunce, Jan 9, 2011
Interesting perspective - Izanoni1, Jan 9, 2011
4
votes

I have cut and pasted this article to read at my leisure.

Many years ago, when I was 12, I went to France for 6 weeks on an exchange visit.

I understood very little French but ..........

Almost instinctively I felt that the "French" were "different" to me. I wondered if this was because I understood almost no French. I came to the conclusion that this was not the whole explanantion, and began to wonder if it was the language itself.

When the exchange students arrived in England some months later I started to think about it again. My conclusion has always been that the language one learns as the "native" language does affect how we see the world, and even ourselves.

At that time the internet did not exist and I had no way and no one to discuss this with.

I wonder if any research has been done on identical twins - separated at birth - and raised learning different "first languages".

I know that becoming really fluent in a language other than English (Danish)changed me - exactly why I still can't explain.

Fascinating.

updated Jan 9, 2011
edited by ian-hill
posted by ian-hill
4
votes

That's a nice article. It also fits in with what I studied in my master's education courses. The theory is that you can only learn things if you already have some place in your brain to put them, some earlier concept to attach them to. These are called schemas, like filing cabinet drawers or clothes hooks. The more you have of as many different kinds, the easier it is to learn new things.

Words seem to form good hooks to hang ideas on. It's difficult to think about things that you don't have a symbol to associate them with. It makes sense to me that your symbol set, in the form of the languages you speak, will have a definite impact on how you think about things.

updated Jan 9, 2011
posted by KevinB
Vygotsky's schemas? (Sorry, I'm a Vygotsky nerd.) - mapletw, Jan 9, 2011
I've always thought of Vygotsky in terms of zones of proximal development, but I think he got a lot of his ideas from Piaget, who was heavily involved with the development of the schema concept. - KevinB, Jan 9, 2011
That would make sense. I studied Vygotsky quite a bit while doing my Masters, and Piaget moreso before that, so I think he's in the forefront of my mind. - mapletw, Jan 9, 2011
4
votes

Ooh, this IS fascinating! I've only read about half so far, but it's really interesting to see how language affects our thought processes. Thanks for posting!

updated Jan 9, 2011
posted by mapletw
3
votes

Really interesting!

One thing I've noticed about English vs. Spanish is that in English people do all the acting, whereas in Spanish objects do some of the acting. For example:

  • I dropped the pen.
  • Se me cayó la pluma.

-

  • I like meat.
  • Me gusta la carne.

-

  • I forgot it.
  • Se me olvidó.

I don't know what impact this might have on how we perceive the world around us or interact with it, but it seems that such a basic thing as perception of action or ownership or responsibility must have some impact.

updated Jan 10, 2011
edited by Lrtward
posted by Lrtward
I totally agree, Leslie. It's as if, the human body, in a maybe religious sense, meaning that Catholicism is still the main religion in Spain - is not belonging to us. Plus, we literally don't purposefully BREAK our own leg. It breaks itself..cont'd - amyfreelance, Jan 9, 2011
it breaks itself.. .which is correct isn't it. Also... to have hunger... to take a coffee "Tomar un cafe". In English we HAVE a coffee - but we don't OWN it. - amyfreelance, Jan 9, 2011
You can take tea in English, if you are 'posh' enough :-). Comparing 'I dropped' with 'se me cayo' one notes a distinct lack of ownership in the latter. I note a distinct lack of ownership and taking of responsibility here (in Colombia)... - afowen, Jan 10, 2011
... and have often wondered how much this was based on world view as influenced by language. Every day things simply happen here, and they are never anyone's fault... - afowen, Jan 10, 2011
3
votes

This is a great article. Moving on from it slightly, I, personally, always have days where I want to express myself in Spanish, my feelings. The transgression between languages is amazing. You do think differently. You approach things differently.

In Spanish I've noticed it is more respectful to certain things.

For example, the masculines and femenines. Like in the article, the femeninity of the key, compared to the German version of a key.

Also, "I love you" in Spanish is "Te quiero". I love you. I want you, from "querer" - to want... I love the fact that you cannot LOVE someone without WANTING them.

There are many examples of this, but I cannot remember them right now!

updated Jan 9, 2011
posted by amyfreelance
3
votes

Follow me to Pormpuraaw, a small Aboriginal community on the western edge of Cape York, in northern Australia. I came here because of the way the locals, the Kuuk Thaayorre, talk about space. Instead of words like "right," "left," "forward," and "back," which, as commonly used in English, define space relative to an observer, the Kuuk Thaayorre, like many other Aboriginal groups, use cardinal-direction terms — north, south, east, and west — to define space.1 This is done at all scales, which means you have to say things like "There's an ant on your southeast leg" or "Move the cup to the north northwest a little bit." One obvious consequence of speaking such a language is that you have to stay oriented at all times, or else you cannot speak properly. The normal greeting in Kuuk Thaayorre is "Where are you going?" and the answer should be something like " Southsoutheast, in the middle distance." If you don't know which way you're facing, you can't even get past "Hello."

The result is a profound difference in navigational ability and spatial knowledge between speakers of languages that rely primarily on absolute reference frames (like Kuuk Thaayorre) and languages that rely on relative reference frames (like English).2 Simply put, speakers of languages like Kuuk Thaayorre are much better than English speakers at staying oriented and keeping track of where they are, even in unfamiliar landscapes or inside unfamiliar buildings. What enables them — in fact, forces them — to do this is their language. Having their attention trained in this way equips them to perform navigational feats once thought beyond human capabilities.

Whoa! I still have to think sometimes just to remember the left-right thing. And, that bit about them arranging pictures in time order from east to west (regardless of what direction they were facing)! How different from our tendency to arrange from left-to-right, or the Hebrew's to arrange time sequences from right-to-left, or Chinese's to do so top-down (or whatever it was). Mind blowing!!!!

And to think so many in times past (and currently, sadly) would consider these people as mindless savages. downer

updated Jan 9, 2011
edited by webdunce
posted by webdunce
1
vote

Apparently, there are no normative ethics in eastern and oriental languages.

Pretty epic considering that all the history books were written by westerners and so they might've got it entirely wrong.

updated Jan 29, 2011
posted by dq59
The book '1421: The Year China Discovered the World' certainly suggests that they might've got it wrong... - afowen, Jan 10, 2011
I will try and get my hands on it, if available in ebook form, do let me know. I suggest you read Dr. Balgangadhara and his book "The Heathen in his blindness" if you are interested at this particular application - dq59, Jan 29, 2011
1
vote

I don't usually think in a language anyway, but more in terms of images.

updated Jan 10, 2011
posted by lorenzo9
1
vote

With reference to Follow me to Pormpuraaw,

I just remembered something my very young son said when asked "Which is your left foot?" (problem with putting on shoes)

His answer was "coming or going?"

updated Jan 10, 2011
posted by ian-hill