el (paquete); lo is for abstract and unknown objects., but your sentence looks incorrect. - 0074b507, Dec 5, 2010
I used lo to avoid repeating el paquete, was I right or wrong? should I have left the lo off the end of the sentence? - kenwilliams, Dec 5, 2010
If you were to word it with the neuter , I think that you would have to use ello. My point was that the pronoun (not definite article) to substitute for paquete must be el not lo. (nor ello). If we know the noun the pronoun must agree (el or ella). - 0074b507, Dec 5, 2010
It's the same as using a demonstrative pronoun (éste or ésta). You can't use esto if you know the noun. - 0074b507, Dec 5, 2010
Think of it similar to el que, la que. The el or la must match the noun that the relative pronoun is referring to. (you can't use lo que if you know the noun) - 0074b507, Dec 5, 2010