Does the yod create or hinder diphthongs?
Also, what is a simple and concise definition of "yod"? I'm trying to figure out its effect on verbs in particular from the standpoint of their evolution from Latin. For example:
Tener Salir Volver
1 Answer
yod.
(De or. hebreo).
f. Fon. Sonido i semiconsonante agrupado con la consonante anterior; p. ej., en pie, o semivocal agrupado con la vocal precedente; p. ej., en reino.
f. Letra que, en algunas lenguas, lo representa.
Real Academia Española © Todos los derechos reservados
QUESTION: Why, then, do verbs tener and venir not have the diphthong ie- in the first person singular, i.e., tengo, vengo?
The /e/ in these forms should have diphthongized, but did not, because of an element in the suffix known as the "yod". This element had the effect of raising the more open /e/ to the more close type found in verbs like debo, debes, etc., thus impeding diphthongization, as follows:
TENEO > tenjo (containing open /e/ and yod [j]) > tenjo (containing close /e/ and yod).
VENEO > venjo (containing open /e/ and yod [j]) > venjo (containing close /e/ and yod).
The yod in the forms tenjo and venjo were then replaced by /g/ (by analogy with verbs like digo and hago), yielding tengo and vengo.
Since the other forms of these verbs did not have a yod in their suffix, the stem vowels either diphthongized or not, according to whether or not they were stressed, for example:
TENES > ténes > tienes But, TENEMUS > tenemos
VENIS > vénes > vienes But, VENIMUS > venimos
By the way, this is all Greek to me, so I'll refrain from answering your thread on verbs evolving from Latin. ![]()