Fue o estuvo??
Could someone please help:
I am talking to a friend about a party that I went to last week and am describing the evening..
Fue una noche muy calor.
or
El noche estuvo muy calor.
I have looked up ser and estar but I just can't seem to make the distinction between the two.
Gracias.
8 Answers
Fue una noche muy calurosa. -> It was a very hot night.
La noche estuvo muy calurosa. -> The night was very hot.
Remember, "noche" is a feminine noun, so its article and adjectives copy its gender. Also use "caluroso" if you want to use hot as an adjective for weather,
I agree with many here, it is more common to make weather phrases with "hacer" as in: Hacía/Hizo calor anoche. -> It was hot last night or the weather was hot last night.
Understanding when to use "ser" and when to use "estar" takes time and practice. This is a useful reference to study: ser-and-estar.
Here's a helpful tip from my personal experience: "ser" is for general and continuous, while "estar" is for situational and a changing state of being.
Ok I'm going to take a crack at this one and I could be wrong, but, I tend to try to use hacer when describing most of weather conditions. Anoche hizo calor or anoche hacía calor. If I were using the weather condition last night as a backdrop for another thing that I'm describling, I'd use hacía calor. Native speakers please come to the rescue!
I found these comments on Wordref.com
- Hoy está nublado. (state) Today is cloudy.
- Hoy es un día nublado (characteristic) Today is a cloudy day.
- Ayer fue un día frío. (characteristic) Yesterday it was a cold day.
- Ayer estuvo frío. (state) Yesterday it was cold.
Welcome to the forum. The difference between ser and estar is one of the biggest issues for English speakers. It can't be summed up in one post, but I like to think of ser as meaning in inherent characteristic of something, while estar means the current state of something. There's nothing inherently hot about nights, so I'd use estar. The problem is you can't use it with calor. Calor is a noun meaning "heat". You have to use it with caliente, which is the adjective meaning "hot". El noche estuvo caliente.
There are a million exceptions to the rule I just mentioned. Some native speakers will tell you there is no rule, you just have to memorize the different meanings. That's unusual in Spanish, but that's about the size of it.
What about 'el noche hizo calor' hacer is used with a lot of weather expressions. ![]()
Wouldn't this be in the imperfect, not the preterit? You're describing something that happened in the past, and the weather at that. It
I'd say "Era una noche muy calor." Without "una noche" it would be "Estaba muy calor."
There are many subtle uses of the verbs ser and estar, however hot and cold weather isn't one of them. For example, hoy hace calor, hace frío, anoche hacía (hizo) calor. However you say, hay viento, hay lluvia, and había tormentas. However, you say está nublado, As far as I know you don't say hoy está caliente. Any other opinions out there?
The fact that God makes weather is good way to explain the fact that hacer is used for calor, frío. But I guess lluvia and viento just happen without His planning. Come to think of it, you don't say hay lluvia, you say llueve, or está lloviendo, right? Doesn't that sound better?