Is the article a bit odd here?
Hello everyone,
In a sentence like "He was crowned king.", the indefinite article ("a (king)") is obviously not needed, but if you were to use it ("He was crowned a king"), would you say:
1) It sounds wrong
2) It sounds a bit odd. Does the person not know what king was he crowned?
3) (Other alternatives, if any, please)
14 Answers
Lazarus said:
Would you write this?
> Queen Elizabeth I was crowned a queen in 1553.
No. It sounds odd. I'd leave out the article.
I would also not use the article here: Obama was sworn in as president in 2008.
I would say that "He was crowned a King." is grammatically incorrect, and is based on an incorrect way of saying "There was crowned a King."
Both phrases come from middle English and are of little relevance today. Another sentence from the same time period is "It am I.", which all grammarians today would consider incorrect.
He was crowned a king = He was a king in general, not any particular king
The second isn't as common as the first, but it's not particularly odd.
Ok, let put some context then. Let's say we are talking about Queen Elizabeth (any of them). Would you write this?
Queen Elizabeth I was crowned a queen in 1553.
Ian said:
3 might indicate he was crowned as a king of say SpanishDict where there might be more than one king crowned..
I tend to agree with Ian on this. If you place the indefinite article here (in these types of sentences), it seems to add a strong implication that the office being alluded to entails a complementary position, i.e. there are other members within this hierarchy who enjoy equal authority to the person being spoken of.
In this case, the phrases "a/as a + sing. noun" seems to hold a similar semantic value to "as one of the + pl. noun."
?He was just sworn in as a member of the council.
?He was just sworn in as one of the members of the council
?He was sworn in as a Senator of Texas in 1992.
?He was sworn in as one of the Senators of Texas in 1992
?He was crowned a King of Middle-Earth.
?He was crowned as one of the Kings of Middle-Earth.
I think that the use of the indefinite article sounds strange because of the implication of absolute and unshared power/authority that is usually inferred by such positions as "king," "emperor" or president etc.
It would sound less strange, for example, were you to say something like, "He was crowned (as) a Duke of that country in 1542 (implies that he was not the only Duke of the country)
Elizabeth could not have been crowned anything but a Queen - being a women.
Excuse me? What does the tiara than the princess below is wearing represent?
Marry a crown prince or be heir apparent and you get to wear a crown, or sorts. It may not be the King or Queen's crown, but they give you some type of symbolic head piece.
Crown Princess Victoria

For me
1 and 3 Lazarus.
3 might indicate he was crowned as a king of say SpanishDict where there might be more than one king crowned..
I would say: 'He was crowned King' This is the best way to express the idea.
It wouldn't be wrong to say 'He was crowned as King' but the word as' would be considered unnecessary since it would most likely leave the reader thinking: ' Well, of course he would be crowned King ..what else could he be crowned as?
In English the definite articles are not used/needed when the meaning is already clear They are used
1 for emphasis eg The King of Spain is coming to visit England not just any King but 'The King of Spain'
or 2 for clarification Bring him the silver crown on the table ( not just a crown but 'the' (silver) crown ....implying the only one that is silver!
I hope this helps you, Lazarus ![]()
I guess I was not sufficiently emphatic in my first answer. The use of the article just doesn't sound wrong, it is incorrect.
He was promoted to Vice President of IBM.--correct
He was promoted to a Vice President of IBM--wrong
There are lots of VPs at IBM, and after his his promotion he is one of them, but that is irrelevant.
There are millions of examples of this.
As with every grammatically incorrect sentence, there are grammatically correct alternatives, so I guess that makes the answer to the original question (3) by default.
One alternative,
He was crowned as king.
You have opened a can of worms here. There are extensive articles written about English definite articles (pun intended). American and British English have many differences in the use of "the". For example, John was taken to hospital in England, but John was taken to the hospital in the USA. Further examples are too numerous to mention.
"He was crowned King" is suffcient.
If you are mentioning King of a place, you could use an article as in "He was crowned the King of Spain," but "He was crowned King of Spain" still sounds more natural. In this case, I would never use "a" - it sounds wierd.
Of course "Él fue un rey cualquiera " would work with "a" ... "He was just a king."
If you go to top of the web page: click on More, Reference, Spanish Grammar, and then Indefinite article and you should find the information you need. Great explanations. Good luck!!!
Ciao!!
He was crowned king = He was made king of wherever he was. He was "The King".
He was crowned a king = He was made a king in general, not any particular king, just one king among many kings in the world.
The second isn't as common as the first, but it's not particularly odd.
I say:
2).
They are both totally correct, but the "a" just sounds unnecessary. When you use the "a", it almost makes you want to ask, "Well, what else would he be crowned, Queen?"