Decía una broma....... why would you ever use imperfect here?
Overheard in a Tvshow (Twin Peaks..... yes I found it in Spanish!) but I can't imagine "decía" instead of dije in that sense. Gracias.
8 Answers
Maybe it was his favorite joke and he used to tell it repeatedly and it wasn't a one time past event.
What was the rest of the context? I was telling a joke when the telephone rang? I can think of situations where you would use decía.
Just as a matter of fact, we do not use decía at all, we use gastar with broma![]()
Estaba gastando una broma...Gastaba una broma...
In any case, I do not understand the question at all, in English you would use a progressive tense too:
I was joking.
Decía una broma a mi querido amigo cuando las muchachas entraron la casa.
HI Saly, this is all reasonable, but I wonder why you are saying that, I can only think of using the same tense in English.
Hey, why did you say that to me! ![]()
Calm down. I was just joking!
Oye ¡por qué has dicho eso?
¡Solo bromeaba, solo estaba gastando una broma, solo gastaba una broma!
Same tense, same meaning, where is the problem?
Decía una broma a mi querido amigo cuando las muchachas entraron la casa.'
Pescador's answer is a great illustration for what I'd say in response to jeezzle's question.
'I was telling a joke to my dear friend when the girls came into the house.'
I only understood very recently that the imperfect often has this sense, and boy it helped me understand my novel more completely because like you, jeezzle, I kept asking myself "'why the imperfect here?" so many times.
It was actually Michel Thomas in his Advanced Course that explained it for me, I can't remember if Paralee gives that sense in her lesson, it's a long time since I did it! Possibly she did and I just didn't take it in effectively. See my comment!
Just wondering now whether or not it would also be correct to say it this way:
Estaba gastando una broma cuando ....
Any further clarification on that would be great. ![]()
That's the problem with learning the imperfect with the wrong approach: you can perfectly use imperfect for things that happened once, even if they ended seconds afterwards. It is the perspective that counts, not the fact that it finished or not.
Same tense, same meaning, where is the problem?
For me, there isn't really a problem any more.
All that remains for me to fully understand it is whether or not there are certain occasions when one uses the imperfect in preference to the past progressive and vice versa.
Now I've made a search on this topic I found a link you kindly posted in response to similar doubts of a member, so maybe it will be useful to post it again.
preterite, imperfect, past progressive
Thanks again for all your hard work Heidi.
![]()