Home
Q&A
The diminutive of Ángel

The diminutive of Ángel

0
votes

I just noticed this on this thread.

Ángel is angel, but the diminutive seems to be angelito. Why does it lose the accent on the á? Is this something that happens with diminutives in general, specifically this word, or is this a mistake?

4025 views
updated May 23, 2010
posted by --Jen--

3 Answers

2
votes

No, name, this is because it ends in l, the accent would naturally fall on the end, so it gets an accent.

But when you add something to it, the accent falls naturally on the second last syllable. No written accent required.

updated May 23, 2010
posted by 00494d19
Thanks Heidita :-). - --Jen--, May 23, 2010
I wouldn't google it. Lots of occurances of ángelita. - 0074b507, May 23, 2010
Actually there is a N A M E , Angelita, so that may be it. - 00494d19, May 23, 2010
1
vote

Two other examples of where the stress is not preserved when forming the diminutive:

botón ? botoncito / botonote

mamá ? mamita, mamacita

updated May 24, 2010
edited by 0074b507
posted by 0074b507
Q - can you quote a diminutive where it doesn't happen. This would really be a triumph. - geofc, May 23, 2010
1
vote

Thinks - - - is nametaken asking about the placement of the diacritical symbol (accent to most of us, including me) or about where the emphasis goes when you say the word?

The first is a whole lot easier of course, fixed by neat rules which one can read up.

But why do we say "angelita" with the emphasis on the "i" when it's derived from "ángel" with the accent on the "a". For me, I find this much more interesting.

PS Please excuse me if I've drifted off to "angelita" rather than "angelito"; my only excuse is that the only young one I have around is a grandaughter.

updated May 23, 2010
edited by geofc
posted by geofc
It didn't occur to me to wonder about that until Heidita's answer, but it is curious :-). - --Jen--, May 23, 2010
Who says only English is "illogical" ? :) - ian-hill, May 23, 2010