eat versus have + breakfast...
I learned that have + breakfast means desayunar, however I'm working with an online exercise of a book called Connect Second Edition which is said
Connect Second Edition is a fun, four-level, multi-skills American English course written and designed specifically for young adolescents.
And instead of have breakfast I find to eat breakfast... so I don't know if this second form is really used in the US... what's happening!?
Thanks!
6 Answers
Hola, Morba
We may say:
Let's eat breakfast.
Let's go to breakfast.
Let's have breakfast.
Let's get breakfast.
![]()
I agree with Delores. To "have" breakfast and to "eat" breakfast (dinner, lunch) are the same.
Examples:
I eat breakfast at 7 a.m.
I have lunch at noon.
I have breakfast with my mother on Wednesdays.
I usually eat dinner at home.
I do not allow my students to use "eat breakfast" ( with minor typographical emendations).
Lo siento, mi reina, pero es absolutamente aceptable en los Estados Juntitos y, por lo que yo sepa, en Englaterra, tambien. Usamso indistamente "eat"/"have" a meal (culaqiera que sea). Desde luego, podemos emplear tambien verbos que expresan directament la misma idea (to breakfast, to lunch, to dine).
I do noot allow my students to use eat breakfast, as this is marked wrong at school.
In my opinion it is a wrong choice of wording anyway, very confusing. After all you don't eat your coffee, and this is part of having breakfast. I teach them the exact difference that way, to make it clear to them they cannot use eat breakfast.
I ate an apple for breakfast, but, I had breakfast at 8.
And yes, I know you can use eat, but that is a very delicate matter to teach, I prefer to be drastic, like with subject pronouns in Spanish
jeje
You can also use "breakfast" as a verb, though it's not common. "I breakfast at 7:30 every morning."
Are at noon and at midday interchangeable?
- I have lunch at noon.
- I have lunch at midday.