Terrible machine translations
Although we'd like to think that machine translators do a pretty decent job, check out just how much gets lost in machine translation at this website. I've had a lot of laughs from the ridiculous things it outputs.
There are certain concepts that it don't seem to translate well across languages multiple times... set the translation languages to the max and see what I mean.
It makes you think twice about trusting any machine translator! (I personally never use them... I use online dictionaries and cross check with Google!)
Here's what I input:
I really love posting on these forums. I have been learning so much.
52 translations later...
"As can be seen in the scene"
Along the way it became things like:
I like this forum can not. More.
I like this forum more sun.
This stage as a Sun
As presented at this stage
4 Answers
It is unfair to blame this on the computers or the programmers. The simple fact is that we, the people who speak a language, are unable to provide an adequate description (set of rules) that would permit translation.Given a comprehensive set of rules, programmers would have little trouble writing programs to implement them. However, such rules do not exist. Our understanding of how language works is mostly, intuitive, rather than analytic. We are prone to say something like "This doesn't sound right"/"This sounds funny." However, when pressed, we cannot say, why it sounds wrong and resort to such vague (unhelpful) statements as "I would never say this."
This reduces to a complaint that computers/programmers are unable to read our minds; to understand what we mean (even if that is not what we say).
The weather is nice -> El tiempo es bonito -> The time is tuna.
Automatic translation will never work. And I write software for a living.
That might explain some troubles I've been having ![]()
However, when pressed, we cannot say, why it sounds wrong and resort to such vague (unhelpful) statements as "I would never say this."
Or the even more useless - nobody who speaks (insert language here) would ever say it like that - as though the person speaking actually had a legitimate and accurate sense of the language as a whole that somehow transcended all regional/local idiomatic usages and dialectic variations.