Home
Q&A
i got a random email.. help??

i got a random email.. help??

0
votes

i received a random email. I dont even know if its in spanish but it seems kinda official and i want to know what it says. Any help would be appreciated.

"Tributária

Prezados,

Vimos, por meio desta, informar sobre a ilegalidade tributária cometida pelas concessionárias de telefonia fixa. Nós da WO ADVOGADOS, colocamos a sua disposição nossos préstimos jurídicos, com fito de buscar a repetição do indébito sobre as contas telefônicas (aproximadamente 5% do valor total da fatura) em dobro, e, ainda, a exclusão das Contribuições Sociais do PIS e COFINS, nas próximas faturas.

Abaixo esclarecemos a matéria, para que você a compreenda, e entenda que as concessionárias estão se locupletando às custas do consumidor.

É ILEGAL REPASSE DE PIS COFINS EM CONTAS TELEFÔNICAS

O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), em recente julgamento reconheceu a ilegalidade do repasse das Contribuições do Programa de Integração Social – PIS e a Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social – COFINS sobre os serviços de telefonia que vem sendo realizado de forma não evidente pelas empresas concessionárias deste serviço.

A decisão da 2ª Turma do STJ considerou que tal cobrança contraria os princípios da boa-fé objetiva e da transparência, assim como se aproveita da fraqueza e ignorância do consumidor, conforme o julgamento, baseado em cobrança pela operadora Brasil Telecom só é autorizado pela lei o repasse para o consumidor do Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias (ICMS).

Em sua conclusão, os Ministros do STJ e os Desembargadores do TJ/RS, entenderam, entre outros, que a telefonia é serviço público, estando submissa ao princípio da legalidade. Como não há previsão em lei que autorize a incidência direta, ou repasse jurídico, das alíquotas do PIS e da COFINS sobre o preço dos serviços de telefonia, a concessionária não pode fazê-lo.

Documentos necessários para o ingresso da ação:

2283 views
updated Sep 11, 2009
posted by vez58

4 Answers

0
votes

I did what u said and translated it. I sent them an email telling them i only speak english before. So its just spam i can ignore?

Tax Prezados, We saw, by means of this, to inform on the illegality tax committed for the concessionaires of fixed telephony. We of the WÓ LAWYERS, place its disposal ours we préstimos legal, with I look to search the claiming an amount paid in error on the telephonic accounts (approximately 5% of the total value of the invoice) in double, and, still, the exclusion of the Social Contributions of PIS and COFINS, in next invoices. Below we clarify the substance, so that understand you it, and understands that the concessionaires are if enriching to the costs of the consumer. IT IS ILLEGAL VIEW OF PIS COFINS IN TELEPHONIC ACCOUNTS The Superior Court of Justiça (STJ), in recent judgment recognized the illegality of the view of the Contributions of the Program of Social Integration - PIS and the Contribution for the Financing of the Social security - COFINS on the telephony services that come being carried through of not evident form for the companies concessionaires of this service. The decision of 2ª Group of the STJ considered that such collection opposes the principles of the objective good-faith and the transparency, as well as if uses to advantage of the weakness and ignorance of the consumer, as the judgment, based on collection for the operator Brazil Telecom alone is authorized for the law the view for the consumer of the Tax on Circulation of Mercadorias (ICMS). In its conclusion, the Ministers of the STJ and the Appeals court judges of the TJ/RS, had understood, among others, that the telephony is public service, being submissa the beginning of the legality. As she does not have forecast in law that authorizes the direct incidence, or to repass legal, of the aliquot ones of the PIS and the COFINS on the price of the telephony services, the concessionaire cannot make it. Necessary documents for the ingression of the action: Natural person: Copy of the last telephonic invoice; Copy of RG and CPF. Legal entity: Copy of the last telephonic invoice; Copy of the Social Contract. We wait its contact better to clarify any doubt, and, I try we use to advantage it so that you come in them to make a visit, we will be to the disposal to give legal lair in the interests of the natural person or in the legal entity. Yours truly, Team WÓ Lawyers.

updated Sep 11, 2009
posted by vez58
0
votes

I didn't want to wade through the legal mumbo jumbo as it is worse than a foreign language, but if you want to get the gist of the note, put in in Bable Fish's Portuguese to English or Spanish translator, whichever serves you best. It seems to be one of those public notices of a class action suit against a telephone company. If it's anything like the ones that I routinely receive, it's a notice telling you that you can opt out of the class action suit and preserve your individual right to sue for damages.

Good luck. 4 years down the road you may get a notice saying that your share of the suit was $1.98 and here is all of the red tape you will have to go through to collect it. Meanwhile the law firm charged $1, 500,000 in fees to get you your $1.98.

updated Sep 11, 2009
posted by 0074b507
0
votes

Ok thanks heaps. I guess im just freaking out a bit. If anyone knows Portuguese feel free to contribute.

updated Sep 11, 2009
posted by vez58
Just a suggestion... You might get help faster if you change the title to "Random email in Portuguese" or something like that. :) - Valerie, Sep 11, 2009
0
votes

This is not Spanish. I believe that may actually be Portuguese

updated Sep 11, 2009
posted by Izanoni1
Yes, it is. - Valerie, Sep 11, 2009