ASK A QUESTION Is "fishes" the plural form of "fish," or fish is already plural?
I have a little question about English, it's a pretty easy one , but I'd like to know your opinion
Is "fishes" the plural of "fish," or is fish already plural?
Which one is better?
Is there a rule that tells you when to use ''fish'' & when to use ''fishes''?
I appreciate your help, muchas gracias ^_^
Fish is both singular and plural.
Nouns with identical singular and plural
Some nouns spell their singular and plural exactly alike; some linguists regard these as regular plurals. Many of these are the names of animals:
Fish is plural - but you will see fishes in some texts such as the Bible.
Fish is plural, but people say fishes sometimes, and children say "fishies". Look at all the pretty fishies. Those aren't fishies they are fishes. No mom, they are fish. Cállate hijo. Nadie le gusta un sabelotodo. Or something like that.
I believe the word "fish" in English is considered an irregular plural when you are describing more than one (from Wiki) :
The word "fish" itself is troublesome, being generally used as a plural when in the context of food, but forming a regular plural otherwise (thus "three lots of fish and chips", "the industry landed 5,200 tonnes of fish in 1998" but "the order of fishes", "the miracle of the loaves and fishes", the phrase "sleep with the fishes"); usage does vary, however, so that for example the phrase "five fish in an aquarium" might to another native user be "five fishes in an aquarium". Using the plural form fish could imply many individual fish(es) of the same species while fishes could imply many individual fish(es) of differing species....
Probably still clear as mud, huh?
Fish is used for the plural much more often than fishes.
Fish will probably never sound odd but fishes sometimes will.
There is no rule that I ever heard of.