Why is Mexico esta en America, rather than Mexico es in America?

Question

Why is the phrase considered "Mexico esta en America" rather than "Mexico es in America?" I don't understand why the estar form is used instead of ser.

• The content of your question is important. I've met Mexicans who are justifiably indignant when US citizens claim exclusive possession of the word "Americans." They, too, are Americans! - 005457e3 Nov 7, 2009
• A very important point. Thank you - solatera Nov 9, 2009

Answer 1

It's a good question, and I'm pleased it's been asked.

In general, ser is used for things more permanent; estar for temporary.

A country's location is permanent, but estar is always used.

Which creates a rule: when referring to location, use estar.

Not logical, of course, but no big surprise, really. There's much in language usage that has no logic.

• Am coming to realize that. Just take it for granted in English which frequently seems to have no logic. - solatera Nov 9, 2009

Answer 2

Welcome to the forum. If you look under the "more" tab you will see an option called Spanish grammar. There is a very tidy explanation of the differences in the uses of ser and estar.You will be able to read it faster than I could type it!

• I don't have that option under the "more" tab. - Malenor Nov 7, 2009
• I think nizhoni1 meant 'Reference' then 'Spanish Grammer'. ;-) - chaparrito Nov 7, 2009

Answer 3

ser is usually used for permanant things and describing yourself and people. estar usually refers to things that a not permenant and places. (ie countries, cities etc ) someone correct me if i am wrong.